[SilverOptimus]

Rumor: Transformers x G.I. Joe Live Action Movie In Development?

[boygenius]

Big, if true.

Maybe not from an artistic aspirations standpoint, but certainly from a desperate attempt to regain relevancy standpoint. Especially if Rise of the Beasts ultimately ends up exceeding its low box office expectations.

https://www.reddit.com/r/boxoffice/c...re_than_meets/

Also, if Paramount could add Michael Keaton in the dual role of both General Hawk and Batman, they might really be onto something.

[captain mal]

I've never liked Transformers mixed with GIJoe. No thanks.

[Underling]

Not my ideal version of GI Joe by a long shot, but I will take it if it helps get Joe back into a major media project.

[TheOverlordCorp]

Are they going to recast? There's probably a line in The Rock's contract that stipulates no good guy can be bigger than him and Optimus Prime is going to look funny as a Tonka truck. Would prefer they went animated with this, but...no one called for my opinion.

[Fred Broca]

Quote:

Originally Posted by captain mal

I've never liked Transformers mixed with GIJoe. No thanks.

Me either, but my only exposure to JOE and Transformers crossovers has been



and given this will be a Di Bonaventura Production I'm not particularly optimistic that it will be any good.

[PhantomTrblmkr]

Mini poll within a thread:

If you could not achieve both and had to choose - would you rather a GI Joe-related movie be good (whatever your definition of that may be) or would you rather it generate cultural interest and mass-market appeal for the brand?

[wehrmanm]

That's one way to boost GI Joe's box office presence: tie it in to an actually successful film franchise.

Hope it doesn't accidentally sink Transformers.

[AxonRey]

Quote:

Originally Posted by PhantomTrblmkr

Mini poll within a thread:

If you could not achieve both and had to choose - would you rather a GI Joe-related movie be good (whatever your definition of that may be) or would you rather it generate cultural interest and mass-market appeal for the brand?

Definitely the latter. If the interest is high, Joe is a varied storytelling universe. If we had the popular interest, in time, we could get the sorts of movies/shows that we might enjoy specifically.

However, both are achievable, I think. And I may go so far as to say the biggest issue with the Tatum-verse is the attempt to create the latter resulted in no consideration of the former.

The MCU has established that you can both respect your core audience (in this case, pre-existing Joe fans, whether its the cartoons, comics, or toys themselves) and appeal to "outsiders" if you prioritize quality and thoughtfulness. So, I don't think you can get the mass appeal without it being "good".

[IzzyTipsy]

This probably should have been the original Transformers live action. All those military guys could have been Joes.

Seems like a way for Hasbro to try and boost GI Joe sales by tying it to Transformers ala the recent O-Rings. Makes me wonder if Joe isn't doing as well as they hoped the lines would, especially with them torching two of the four lines in 3 years.

How would a toy line even work? 2" Joes to go with 6" Transformers? 6" both scales and they'd just never really interact in a display?